Previous
Article:
Faculty
Profiles
Back
to contents |
 
 
The Urkesh project team, Summer 2002
Westwood
Beyond clay and beyond paper
The Urkesh digital project spends a study season
in the Fowler
by Giorgio Buccellati
3000 BC Syro-Mesopotamia
1500 AD Europe
2000 AD America
These
sequence pairs
describe the simplified trajectorieschronological and geographicalof the
great discoveries in the articulation and communication of human thought:
writing on clay, the printing press, the computer.
So
here we are, in 2002 AD, working on our Urkesh data from about 2300 BC.
We have long since graduated from clay. Is it the same for paper? And
need we? The fact that you are reading this on paper would suggest a negative
answereven though everything up to the final transfer on paper was done
electronically. The real answer is not so much technical as it is conceptual.
Do we think paper or digital?
It
is in these terms that I have approached, consistently, the question of
the publication of our data from ancient Urkesh, modern Tell Mozan, in
northeastern Syria. And this past summer we have concentrated even more
than usual on these questions, during a study season in the bowels of
Fowler rather than in Mozan itself. From mid-June to mid-August a portion
of our staff gathered at UCLA to work on our publications. And we were
also able to present some of our results at an informal gathering in the
Institute: the occasion was the publication of a volume on conservation
at Urkesh, edited by Sophie Bonetti, the Director of our Conservation
Program, who was in town for our study season.
This
most recent Urkesh volume is published on paper and also electronically
on CD. This is a mirror copy that reproduces exactly the information given
in the book. But it is not the same as, say, the difference between soft-
and hard-cover editions of the same book. The electronic version has many
advantages: it contains internal links; it is searchable; it includes
color documentation (not in the paper edition); it does not take up shelf
space, and it can be distributed at practically no cost.
The
latter is really a marketing decision: in our case, the CD sells for $5
(and the book for $25), with explicit permission given for making copies
from it. In addition, it will also be posted on the Urkesh website for
free downloading. There is thus no limit to effective scholarly dissemination.
A
digital edition of this type is by no means a novelty. In our own case,
the first digital publication goes back to 1987, when the physical medium
was a 5 1/4 inch floppy disk for a DOS system. The first Windows-based
CD-ROM was a Festschrift in honor of Lloyd Cotsen and was issued in 2000.
The technical aspect of this digital production is under the most capable
supervision of our graduate student Fanxi Xu.
But
what is the conceptual dimension of such digital publishing? If you look
well, we are still solidly within the realm of paper. The digital
version is truly a mirror copy of the paper edition in that it
is conceived as essentially sequential. Even the links and search function
are conceptually no more than an extension of footnotes and indices, however
much easier and more efficient. The real qualitative jump to a more germane
use of the electronic medium is when we detach our mindset from sequentiality
and look at the medium for both an analytical and a synthetic processing
of the data. This other level of electronic publishing is what we were
working on during our summer season at the Cotsen. It will produce what
I call the "Urkesh Global Record," based on a rigorous grammar
that allows a maximization of the input and leads to a complex automated
synthesis of the data. But of this I will write another time, when this
other type of digital publication will be fully ready. A fuller exposition
of this method of publication will come with the publication of the Urkesh
Global Record.
Not
that we should hold the sequential (paper) mode in disregard. There are
at least two important aspects that make it, I believe, still irreplaceable.
The first is that the nature of any argument is essentially linear, and
the logic inherent in the propositional flow of the discourse adheres
closely to the sequential scrolling through a paper product. The physical
construction of the page(s) matches the conceptual construction of the
argument. Conversely, excessive reliance on a conceptual scanning (matching
the electronic scanning) may all too easily rob us of a full appreciation
for the profundity of an argument being developed. In this respect, it
matters little whether the page is embodied in a paper product
or in the electronic medium.
A shepherd would have known his sheep without the help
of writing: but how could he account, without writing, for changes over
time in flocks of thousands of animals?
But in another respect we are still more closely anchored in the paper
mode. The physical construct which we know as bound printed pages offers
a perceptual grasp of the whole that is missing in the electronic medium.
The perception of a whole held between two covers is quite distinct from
that of a directory of folders and files. This special perceptual relationship
to the book is such that it may remain with us into the distant future,
just as memorizing by rote remained even after writing, or as the physical
reality will remain, upstream of the virtual one, or gourmet food in spite
of vitamin pills! It was thought with the advent of the fax machine that
the postal service would go out of business in a few years: instead the
quantity of mail increased dramatically. It may be that electronic publishing
does not herald the death of paper publishing but invigorates it.
So, yes, we are
going beyond paper, as our forebears went beyond memory by writing on
clay. Our instinctive archaeoogical mindset will help us place the electronic
revolution in perspective by looking at that other revolution, ushered
in by the origin of writing. More than technical, we are dealing with
conceptual revolutions/transformations. A shepherd would have known his
sheep without the help of writing: but how could he account, without writing,
for changes over time in flocks of thousands of animals? A bard would
remember a long poem: but how could he compare, without writing, multiple
occurrences of the same word in different contexts? Thus writing changed
the conceptual toolkit with which humans related to their world. Writing
was infinitely more than an aide-mémoire. It changed our
mind. So with computers. They do infinitely more than simply providing
greater efficiency in writing and publishing. Tapping their potential
means tapping, and expanding, our own mental potential. The Urkesh digital
project is a small step along this road.
Giorgio
Buccellati is Emeritus Professor in the Department of Near Eastern Languages
and Cultures (http://www.ioa.ucla.edu/buccellati.htm).
Back To Top
|
|